If you tolerate male circumcision, you’re undeniably a hypocrite

It’s pretty simple: if a girl has a legal right to her foreskin (clitoral hood), which develops from the the exact same embryonic tissue as the male foreskin, then a male must have the same legal rights.

I will assume you are against sex discrimination, and support equal protection under the law. So if you believe in male circumcision as legitimate cultural expression, then you must also believe in circumcision of female foreskin. If you believe in banning all forms of female circumcisions, then you must also believe in banning all forms of male circumcision too. Otherwise you are a hypocrite. So which are you:

– In support of cutting all foreskins, whether male or female?
– Against all genital cutting?
– A hypocrite?

Additional question:
A question for women who tolerate circumcision: are you glad that your genitals are fully protected by the law from any kind of cutting whatsoever? Why does my body not deserve the same full protection from harm?  If you had any part of your genitalia cut off when you were a child, do you think you might complain about it when you were older? Why is it that when I complain, people dismiss what I say entirely, or even respond with ridicule? Would you want your own complaints to be ignored?